TLD Churn and Retention Matrix

Cohort Intelligence

Not all domain volume represents durable enterprise adoption. Aggressive $0.99 introductory discounts generate artificial registration spikes that collapse at the second-year renewal cliff. This matrix audits retention durability, monthly deletion velocity, and renewal cliff volatility across all reporting gTLDs.

Evergreen Anchors 12 <2.5% monthly churn
Balanced Commercial 13 2.5% to 5.0% churn
Promo-Cliff Volatility 0 >5.0% monthly drop rate
Core Anchor Renewal 78.5% Multi-year average
Interactive Model First-Year Renewal Cliff Simulator

Simulate Portfolio Second-Year Renewal Collapse

Calculate the real financial yield of low-cost acquisition promotions by modeling second-year drop-off rates and renewal carrying costs.

Year 1 Gross Inflow $19,900
Year 2 Retained Domains 2,800 domains
Year 2 Dropped / Churned 7,200 domains (-72%)
Year 2 Renewal Revenue $69,972

Empirical gTLD Churn & Retention Ledger

Audited ICANN Reporting
Extension Active Domains Monthly Deletions Est. Renewal Rate Est. Y1 Drop Rate Retention Classification Registry Operator
.com 159,537,930 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Verisign
.net 12,990,280 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Verisign
.org 10,782,195 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Public Interest Registry
.info 3,789,968 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Identity Digital
.xyz 2,966,772 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor XYZ.com
.top 2,655,678 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Identity Digital
.online 2,426,389 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Identity Digital
.site 2,019,017 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Identity Digital
.shop 1,454,339 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Identity Digital
.biz 1,386,270 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor GoDaddy Registry
.app 1,128,361 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor Google Registry
.club 1,093,744 2.15% / mo 68.0% 18% Evergreen Anchor GoDaddy Registry
.vip 935,823 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial GoDaddy Registry
.dev 826,457 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Google Registry
.tech 505,597 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Identity Digital
.tokyo 182,817 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial GoDaddy Registry
.nyc 77,939 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial GoDaddy Registry
.london 61,953 2.14% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Nominet
.paris 23,936 2.14% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Identity Digital
.wed 795 2.09% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Atgron, Inc.
.google 319 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Google Registry
.apple 139 2.11% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Apple
.bmw 91 2.15% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial BMW
.barclays 84 1.16% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Barclays
.blanco 4 0.00% / mo 68.0% 32% Balanced Commercial Identity Digital

TLD Churn and Retention FAQ

Audited FAQ Reference

Q1. What is the domain first-year renewal cliff?

The first-year renewal cliff occurs when a registry or registrar sells domain registrations at deep loss-leader promotional prices (e.g. $0.99 or $1.99). In the second year, registrations revert to full wholesale retail prices ($15 to $40), causing 60% to 80% of speculative registrations to drop and fail renewal.

Q2. How is domain delete rate calculated in ICANN monthly reports?

The monthly delete rate measures domain deletions during the reporting period as a percentage of total active domain registrations in the registry. Delete rates above 5.0% monthly indicate severe portfolio churn exceeding 50% annualized turnover.

Q3. Why do legacy gTLDs maintain significantly higher retention than new gTLDs?

Legacy extensions such as .com, .net, and .org are heavily anchored in established corporate email systems, active production websites, and enterprise DNS infrastructure, resulting in enduring renewal rates between 75% and 82% compared to new gTLDs that rely on promotional acquisition.

Q4. How does high portfolio churn impact registry financial health?

High churn forces registries onto a continuous acquisition treadmill where they must constantly discount introductory prices to maintain headline registration numbers, depressing gross margins and increasing abusive registration vulnerability.