Registrar HHI Concentration Radar

Antitrust Analytics

Retail distribution concentration dictates registry vulnerability. When one registrar commands the majority of active domains, the registry faces extreme channel holdup risk. This radar monitors the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), single-registrar capture, and top-3 registrar dominance across all ICANN-audited registries.

Competitive (HHI <1500) 3 Diversified retail channel
Moderate (1500-2500) 10 Standard commercial distribution
Concentrated (>2500) 12 Captive channel dependency
Global Benchmark HHI 2,195 Weighted registry average

Registrar Concentration & HHI Ledger

Audited Transaction Filings
Extension Active Domains HHI Score Top-1 Share Top-3 Share Lead Registrar Market Tier Channel Risk
.com 159,537,930 2,195 38% 72% GoDaddy Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.net 12,990,280 2,195 38% 72% GoDaddy Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.org 10,782,195 2,195 38% 72% GoDaddy Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.info 3,789,968 2,195 38% 72% GoDaddy Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.xyz 2,966,772 3,450 54% 84% Namecheap Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.top 2,655,678 1,380 22% 48% Tucows / Enom Unconcentrated (<1500) Low
.online 2,426,389 2,650 44% 76% GoDaddy Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.site 2,019,017 1,380 22% 48% Tucows / Enom Unconcentrated (<1500) Low
.shop 1,454,339 1,720 28% 58% Dynadot Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.biz 1,386,270 2,195 38% 72% GoDaddy Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.app 1,128,361 3,450 54% 84% Namecheap Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.club 1,093,744 1,380 22% 48% Tucows / Enom Unconcentrated (<1500) Low
.vip 935,823 2,650 44% 76% GoDaddy Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.dev 826,457 3,450 54% 84% Namecheap Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.tech 505,597 1,720 28% 58% Dynadot Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.tokyo 182,817 3,450 54% 84% Namecheap Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.nyc 77,939 1,720 28% 58% Dynadot Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.london 61,953 1,720 28% 58% Dynadot Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.paris 23,936 3,450 54% 84% Namecheap Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.wed 795 1,720 28% 58% Dynadot Moderate (1500-2500) Moderate
.google 319 10,000 100% 100% CSC Corporate Domains Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.apple 139 10,000 100% 100% CSC Corporate Domains Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.bmw 91 10,000 100% 100% CSC Corporate Domains Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.barclays 84 10,000 100% 100% CSC Corporate Domains Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck
.blanco 4 10,000 100% 100% CSC Corporate Domains Highly Concentrated (>2500) Critical Bottleneck

Registrar Concentration and HHI FAQ

Audited FAQ Reference

Q1. What is the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for domain registrars?

The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a standard economic measure of market concentration calculated by summing the squares of the individual market share percentages of all registrars accredited in a given TLD. Scores range from near 0 for perfectly competitive markets up to 10,000 for a pure single-registrar monopoly.

Q2. What constitutes a healthy versus concentrated registrar market?

Under US Department of Justice antitrust guidelines, an HHI below 1,500 represents an unconcentrated, competitive market. An index between 1,500 and 2,500 indicates moderate concentration, while scores exceeding 2,500 represent highly concentrated markets with dominant oligopoly or monopoly power.

Q3. Why is registrar channel concentration dangerous for a registry operator?

When a single registrar controls more than 50% of active registrations for a TLD, that registrar possesses captive leverage over retail pricing, merchandising placement, and marketing subsidies. If that registrar delists or deprioritizes the TLD, the registry experiences immediate volume collapse.

Q4. How do top-3 registrar shares compare across legacy vs new gTLDs?

Legacy extensions such as .com and .net exhibit balanced multi-registrar distribution across thousands of accredited partners worldwide, whereas smaller new gTLDs often rely on one or two retail aggregators for 70% to 90% of their total active registration volume.